Here in BC we’re one week into the provincial election campaign. The environment has been one of the bigger stories, but not in a way you would expect. Environmentalists have been fighting amongst themselves trying to figure out which party is more evil: the Liberals for the Gateway program, privatizing water resources, and numerous environmental failings; or the NDP for its opportunistic opposition to North America’s first carbon tax. I’m not happy with either party, and will likely vote Green for the first time ever, but it’s worth digging in to this issue a bit more.
One of my favourite blogs, the DeSmogBlog, the David Suzuki Foundation, and prominent environmentalist Tzeporah Berman has been leading the charge against the NDP. I’ve been a bit upset about their hammering of the NDP. No doubt, the NDP deserves the criticism, but the sole focus on the carbon tax has ignored all the failings of the Liberal government on other issues. It’s as if a tiny carbon tax (which up until now has had no impact on reducing carbon emissions) has excused the Liberals for all of their environmental sins, like Gateway which alone will lead to more emissions then the carbon tax will reduce.
Ian Gill, the president of Ecotrust where Emily works, wrote an insightful blog post today where he asks people to look at each party’s whole platform and examine how each piece addresses climate change. Also today, the mayors of Metro Vancouver have announced that they want part of the carbon tax revenue to be spent on public transit (from Stephen Rees’s blog). I think this is a great idea. I’ve written about the carbon tax before. It’s biggest failing is that the revenue all goes into tax reductions, and none goes to provide alternatives to avoid paying the carbon tax. Most carbon emitting actions aren’t optional for the average person – driving his car and heating her house are unavoidable. A successful carbon tax needs to change behaviour, but that is only possible if choices are available. It makes sense to fund those alternatives with the carbon tax.
The NDP’s opposition of the carbon tax has pissed me off. Even though I think the carbon tax is ineffective in its current form, it should be improved not axed. The NDP stance is pure political opportunism. The party thinks it can gain more votes in the suburbs and the interior (where public transit is non existent) then it will lose in places like Vancouver. The worst part is they are probably right. Under our current electoral system, their are only a handful of swing ridings that decide the election. Most of those ridings happen to be in the suburbs and the interior. My current riding is so heavily NDP, that my defection to the Green Party will hardly be noticed by the NDP. It’s one of the many reasons I support BC-STV. Under an STV electoral system, each vote becomes a lot more important because there are less “wasted” votes (votes for losing candidates or for candidates that have more then enough to win). If we had STV, the NDP would be less likely to turn against environmentalists within the party to try and win a few extra swing votes in tighter contests elsewhere.
The other big election story was the NDP candidate in Vancouver, Ray Lam, who had to resign because someone leaked inappropriate photos from his Facebook page. He’s 22. Who under the age of 30 doesn’t have inappropriate photos of them posted online? Seriously. I think we’re dealing with a major generation gap issue here. I’m sure most elected politicians have done stupider stings when they were younger (heck, Gordon Campbell was arrested for drunk driving!), but they didn’t grow up in an age where photos were digital and posted online for all to see. And just to make it easier for anyone trying to discredit me, here are the photos I could find on Flickr that will preclude me from entering politics, and I live a pretty tame life. (Note: I’m know there are worse of me out there somewhere)
Is it bad that I could immediately think of 3 incriminating Porter pictures from totally seperate incidents?
I’m thinking of the scunt one with a chocolate-drenched Porter. Which are YOU thinking of?
I was thinking of that one plus two others:
1) Chris passed out beside the toilet in Sarah and Casey’s Archstone Apartment.
2) The photo that led to a flirtatious cell-phone tussle at Buca Di Beppo. Oooh la la! :O
I had forgot about #2.
Hey. I need some more details about the STV and what it will mean for my vote. I know you mentioned it after the Sun Run, but I’m trying to figure out how I should vote and am not really familiar with the STV system.
I’m in the same boat as you, pissed at the Liberals for the heaps of mistakes they’ve made and insufficient environmental platform going forward and I’m super pissed at the NDP for attempting to scrap the carbon tax instead of improving it as you’ve suggested. Gateway sucks. Rolling back Translink fare increases is stupid and giving them so much of the carbon tax revenue looks unlikely due to the Vancouver-centred-ness of such a plan and the violation of the original promise of revenue neutrality. Lots of the plans going around are stupid. What will it mean for me to vote green in our area with the STV system?
P.S. I think there are more (and crazier) photos of me! Though that one of you and Doug from IRS is awesome.
There’s a simulation of what STV would look like for BC running here: STV Simulation. You can vote in a number of runnings and see what happens with your votes and how winners are chosen.
The nice thing about the STV system is you rank your favourite candidates from 1..N. I think it will have a big impact on how candidates act because there’s a huge advantage to:
A) appeal to voters outside your party.
B) be the best candidate within your party.
Hopefully that will mean candidates would be more willing to break away from party lines. Also, crappy candidates within a popular party would be less likely to win. Take John van Dongen, the Liberal MLA from Abbotsford (who was in charge of public safety) who made news for loosing his license for dangerous driving. He’ll likely win re-election, because Abbotsford the Liberals are hugely popular there. However, under STV he’d have a tougher time because most Liberal supporters would rank other Liberal candidates higher.
In this election, I’d more likely to rank the best Green candidates first. Then I’d rank the NDP candidates who were most supportive of environmental issues.
If this was the ballot (you’d be Vancouver West and I’d be in Vancouver East) I’d probably rank:
1) Damian Kettlewell (Green)
2) Jean-Michel Toriel (Green)
3) Spencer Herbert (NDP)
4) Mel Lehan (NDP)
5) Drina Read (Green)
and then some mismash of NDP and green candidates
If Damian Kettlewell didn’t have enough support to get elected, my vote would pass down the list to my 2nd, 3rd, … nth choice.
Re: STV Voting
Whoops. This would be your ballot (Vancouver West).